As our nation鈥檚 politicians and policymakers look for ways to improve America鈥檚 public education system, the teaching institution is coming under direct fire. From conducting background checks on teachers to holding instructors accountable for students鈥 lackluster test scores, the entire foundation of our education system is being challenged.
Interestingly, a model for improving the quality of our teachers may already exist in the Teach for America program. This is a nonprofit organization that recruits high-achieving college graduates to teach for two years in low-income schools. Teach for America teachers do not have to undergo the traditional credentialing process; they receive 鈥渂oot camp鈥 training and then are given full responsibility for a classroom of students.
Yet despite their lack of traditional teaching credentials, Teach for America teachers are often more effective than their veteran teacher colleagues at improving student performance. In part, this success can be attributed to the rigorous analysis that the organization performs of its teachers.
This video offers some pros and cons of the Teach America experience.
How Teach for America Measures Performance
For the past decade, Teach for America has analyzed the profiles of its teacher applicants and the test scores of students in an ongoing attempt to identify the traits that the best teachers have.
Teach for America鈥檚 internal analyses identify a teacher as one of the 鈥渂est鈥 if the teacher moves his or her