��������

Gay-straight student alliances have been formed in schools for more than two decades. Still, many students face seemingly insurmountable odds in getting their extracurricular organizations accepted in the public school system. Schools across the country have tried to keep these clubs from forming despite an act that clearly states the rights of students of all types of sexual orientation. Recently, Education Secretary Arne Duncan sent a “Dear Colleagues” letter to school districts, reminding them of a law passed by the Reagan administration that allows LGBT students to organize clubs and alliances on school property. We will examine that letter, as well as the 1984 legislation that requires schools to treat all extracurricular activities equally regardless of race, religion, or sexual orientation.

The Problem for Gay-Straight Student Support Groups

According to an article in the , the problem with gay-straight support groups in public schools came to the forefront of public policy in 2006 when White County High School in Georgia tried to ban a gay-straight alliance student club from forming at the school. The argument was taken to court, where Federal District Judge William C. O’Kelley wrote a 35-page decision that issued a permanent injunction requiring the school to allow the group to meet on its campus. However, this is not the first time a situation involving a gay-straight club was taken to court.

In 2000, Colin vs. Orange Unified School District also resulted in a ruling that required a school

Many schools around the country are failing to live up to academic expectations. Some are finding that the training of the teacher makes the difference in the quality of the education their students receive. Enter Teach for America – the education industry's equivalent of "boot camp" for aspiring teachers, providing the training and experience they need to succeed in even the most challenging academic environments. But is Teach for America really the knight on the white horse or a way to take the community out of the education process? This article will take a look at the pros and cons of this teacher training program.

This video explains the admissions process for Teach America.

What is Teach for America?

Teach for America started as an undergraduate thesis for Wendy Kopp during her studies at Princeton University. According to the , Kopp believed numerous college students would be willing to assume teaching positions over more lucrative careers if the proper training corps was in place to prepare them. During its inception year in 1990, Teach for America trained 500 men and women to teach in six low-income communities around the United States. Today, that number has grown to 28,000, making Teach for America the largest provider of teachers to low-income areas.

The approach taken by Teach for America is to train up a corps of teachers from over-achieving college students,

School districts are expected to perform at a particular level according to standards set at both the state and federal levels. When schools within that district fail to meet their expectations adequately over time, measures must be taken to ensure students get the quality of education they need to succeed. While most parents, educators, and lawmakers agree with this fundamental principle, the path to meeting those goals is often controversial. That is especially true when failing schools are met with a takeover by the state government – which is happening in many school districts today.

The Anatomy of a State Takeover

States do not take over schools overnight or because of one round of poor test scores. Many states have policies where schools cannot be touched until they have been on probation for an extended period, and their test scores have not improved significantly during that time. In most states explored in this article, school districts had as much as six years to turn around their academic achievement before the state government considered getting involved. However, even when schools have adequate time to reverse their poor performance levels, state takeovers of schools are not considered lightly, and many parents, students, educators, and lawmakers do not readily accept them.

When a state government does determine it is time to take control of a specific, low-performing school, that process can look different from state to state and even from school to school. The typical model is for the

Spanking is throughout the country. However, some school districts still allow – and practice – the act when administrators or teachers feel it is necessary to keep students in line and maintain control of the classroom. In most of those cases, students can be spanked without parental consent and under the strict guidelines of the school district. However, some parents do not feel the current policies are enough to protect their children. In some areas, spanking laws have come under fire once again, as schools are faced with the quandary of abiding by parents' wishes and keeping a disciplined classroom in order. We will look at some areas where this issue is revisited in public schools.

A Brief History of Spanking

Spanking, also known as corporal punishment, is defined on Wikipedia as

the deliberate infliction of pain as retribution for an offense, or for the purpose of disciplining or reforming a wrongdoer.

It is also used as a deterrent for unacceptable behaviors or attitudes. Spanking often involves the use of an implement, such as a belt or ruler, rather than hitting the offender with a hand.

In schools, the discipline is generally administered by a teacher or school administrator on the buttocks, using a paddle or open hand. Most schools do not require permission from the parent to perform a spanking, although some schools do send home a permission slip to parents before spanking a child who has been